01
Time to a live payment
Measure the self-serve path through first broadcast or detection on supported mainnet, then assess blockchain confirmation and finality separately.
Compared on five criteria
43 crypto payment providers: licences, custody, KYC, and known risks. The main column is the all-in cost — what a 50 USDT payment on Tron costs from acceptance to money in your own wallet. The weights are adjustable: pick a preset or move the sliders.
Licences, MiCA, regulator actions
Years in business, hacks, blockchain-analytics flags
All-in cost of one 50 USDT payment
Invoices, payouts, fiat, integrations
KYC, time to go live, available countries
The bar in the Score column splits the total by criterion: the longer a coloured segment, the more that criterion added. Click a provider’s row to open its scores by criterion, the cost breakdown, and the list of sources.
| # | Assets and networks | Licences | Risks | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Details for PaymosPaymos Active | 8.1 | General-purpose gateways | Custodial | 1.0% | USDT, USDC, USD1, DAI, XAUT; 13 networks | No | None No documents or questionnaire at sign-up | Not found | No public licences stated | Yes Merchant categories are neither approved nor refused — per the terms | Yes | No BTC or other native coins, no withdrawal to a bank account, and no automatic subscription charges. No public SLA. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 2/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 9/10 Features 8/10 Ease of onboarding 10/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 1.0% = 0.50 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 0.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT 1% is the all-in cost: Paymos covers the transfer from the invoice address to the balance, and withdrawals carry no percentage fee. Worth knowingA 1% fee per paid invoice. There is no separate withdrawal commission, and the network fee is subsidised: on a withdrawal the merchant pays less than the transfer costs. The fee rounds down to the asset’s smallest unit; lower rates on request. Four stablecoins and gold-backed XAUT, accepted on 13 networks and paid out on 11. Eight server SDKs, eight CMS plugins, payment links, an embedded checkout, a browser-based POS terminal, and a Telegram bot. An invoice is issued in one of 46 fiat currencies, and the rate is locked before the payer opens a wallet. RisksNo BTC or other native coins, no withdrawal to a bank account, and no automatic subscription charges. No public SLA. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 2 | Details for MoonPay CommerceMoonPay Commerce formerly Helio Helio rebrand | 7.7 | Large payment companies | Non-custodial Payments go straight to the merchant | 2.0% | USDC, USDT, ETH, SOL, BTC, and more | Yes Auto-conversion to USD and EUR | None Verification through Sumsub is voluntary — only recommended | Via group MoonPay: CASP, Netherlands | Helio Fintech Limited, England and Wales, no. 13836904. The MoonPay group holds licences, but for other products; Commerce itself states that it is neither a VASP nor a money transmitter | Yes From 2% | No data | None noted | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 7/10 Reliability 8/10 Cost 7/10 Features 8/10 Ease of onboarding 8/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee no withdrawal, the money is already yours Total per payment 1.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT 2% is the standard fee; 1% is for holders of their HelioX NFT pass, which is bought separately; high-risk platforms pay no less than 2%. Money goes from the buyer straight to the merchant’s wallet, so there is no transfer to balance and no withdrawal. Worth knowing6,000+ businesses, according to MoonPay. Payment links, subscriptions, deposits, a checkout widget, and Solana Pay for Shopify. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 3 | Details for PaymentoPaymento On Tron, connected wallet only | 7.1 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Non-custodial | 0.5% | 9 coins and tokens on 7 networks, including USDT on Tron | No | None No documents requested | Not found | Prokey Technologies Inc. (Ontario) and Paymento Inc, Canadian law; no licences stated | No data | Yes | On Tron they have no address or QR payment at all, in either mode, and it cannot be switched on — their docs: “Embedded Wallet does not currently provide a plain address-and-QR checkout for Tron… cannot be changed”. With a single address, the payer can be identified only through a connected wallet, and the invoice closes by matching the sender’s address. Their own warning: “Customers paying from an exchange account, custodial application, or wallet that cannot connect may be unable to complete these payments”. Paying with a withdrawal from an exchange does not work with them. The 0.5% itself is taken not from the crypto received but from a prepaid balance held with Paymento. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 10/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 8/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.5% = 0.25 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee no withdrawal, the money is already yours Total per payment 0.25 USDT of 50.00 USDT We count the own-wallet mode: 0.5%, and the merchant pays no gas. On Tron there is one address — your own; the buyer pays straight to it and covers the network fee, and no second transfer exists. Their docs: “Because payments arrive directly in your wallet, there is no settlement step”. In this mode an address per invoice is issued only on UTXO networks, from an xPub; the embedded wallet also issues one on EVM networks and Solana, but not on Tron. Worth knowingPayments to your own wallet or to the embedded one, payment links with recurring billing, and a bot for access to private Telegram groups. The first $15 in fees is free. Pay in instalments (BNPL) is still in development. RisksOn Tron they have no address or QR payment at all, in either mode, and it cannot be switched on — their docs: “Embedded Wallet does not currently provide a plain address-and-QR checkout for Tron… cannot be changed”. With a single address, the payer can be identified only through a connected wallet, and the invoice closes by matching the sender’s address. Their own warning: “Customers paying from an exchange account, custodial application, or wallet that cannot connect may be unable to complete these payments”. Paying with a withdrawal from an exchange does not work with them. The 0.5% itself is taken not from the crypto received but from a prepaid balance held with Paymento. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 4 | Details for ATLOSATLOS Active | 6.9 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Non-custodial The merchant’s Web3 wallet | 1.0% | USDT on Tron, Ethereum, Solana, BSC, Base, Arbitrum, and Polygon | Partly Via the merchant’s exchange account | None No email or phone number | Not found | Operator: ATLOS DAO, with no company details; disputes go to Kleros Court under Singapore law | Yes | Yes | ATLOS takes its fee only from payments made through the smart contract. It cannot withhold the fee from a manual transfer, so the amount owed builds up and is deducted from the next payment through the contract — a single deduction can exceed 1%. A caveat on the pricing page says the rate may vary with the business’s risk. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 3/10 Cost 9/10 Features 5/10 Ease of onboarding 10/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 1.0% = 0.50 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee no withdrawal, the money is already yours Total per payment 0.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT The fee is 1% and nothing else: no fixed fees, no withdrawal fee. The smart contract sends the money straight to the merchant’s wallet. Worth knowingA merchant account opens in seconds when you connect a Web3 wallet such as MetaMask: no approval, no verification, and email is optional. RisksATLOS takes its fee only from payments made through the smart contract. It cannot withhold the fee from a manual transfer, so the amount owed builds up and is deducted from the next payment through the contract — a single deduction can exceed 1%. A caveat on the pricing page says the rate may vary with the business’s risk. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | Details for NOWPaymentsNOWPayments Active | 6.8 | General-purpose gateways | Both models Held on a balance or forwarded to a wallet | 6.0% | 350+ tokens | Yes To a bank account through a partner, 20+ currencies, after KYB | Light Documents only for a suspicious transaction or for fiat features | No Their terms exclude EU residents | FD Transfers LLC, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; no public licences stated | Yes Dedicated solutions for casinos and 18+ sites | No data | No public licences. Under their terms, they do not serve residents of the EU, the UK, the US, the UAE, or Russia. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 4/10 Features 9/10 Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 1.0% = 0.50 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 3.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT 1% for processing without conversion; 1.5% if the payment is converted, the rate is fixed, or the buyer pays the fee. We count the balance-custody mode, which carries one network fee (the market 2.5 USDT); without custody, forwarding to a wallet, there are two. Withdrawal from the balance carries no service fee. Worth knowingFrom the ChangeNOW team, running since 2019: mass payouts, CMS plugins, and 350+ tokens. RisksNo public licences. Under their terms, they do not serve residents of the EU, the UK, the US, the UAE, or Russia. Where we looked
Full data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 6 | Details for Trybit | 6.5 | CIS, minimal KYC | Custodial | 4.7% | 18 coins, 10 networks | No Crypto only | Nominally none The knowledge base says “not required”; the terms say they apply KYC and may ask who the beneficial owners are | Not found | No legal entity named: no company, country, or number | Yes Gambling, Adult, and Online Gaming in their own Solutions menu | Yes | The old cryptocloud.plus domain was not shut down after the rebrand: the same rates, and its own dashboard login, separate from app.trybit.com. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 6/10 Cost 5/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 1.9% = 0.95 USDT Transfer to balance 1.40 USDT (their figure) Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 2.35 USDT of 50.00 USDT 1.9% for processing and $1.40 for the transfer on Tron — both figures from their price list. Withdrawal carries no percentage; only the network fee is taken. Worth knowingCMS plugins, payment links, bots, and mass payouts. The fee for the transfer to balance applies only on Tron and Ethereum; other networks have none. Partners get 15% of the fees paid by merchants they refer. RisksThe old cryptocloud.plus domain was not shut down after the rebrand: the same rates, and its own dashboard login, separate from app.trybit.com. Where we looked
Partial data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | Details for ApironeApirone Active | 6.5 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Non-custodial Forwarding to your wallet | 6.0% | BTC, LTC, BCH, DOGE, TRX, ETH, BNB, GRAM; USDT on Tron, ERC20, BEP20, and TON; USDC on Tron, ERC20, and BEP20 | No | None | Not found KYC for MiCA is in their plans for 2027 | Apirone OÜ, Tallinn, Estonia; no licences stated | Yes Gambling and 18+ are covered in their industry guides | No data | None noted | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 4/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 0.50 USDT Total per payment 3.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT Acceptance costs nothing. Outgoing transfers cost “1% + Network Fee”, word for word from their pricing page: the network fee comes on top of the percentage, and the merchant pays it. With Instant Forwarding, such a transfer happens on every payment, so the network fee is counted, at the market cost of 2.5 USDT. Worth knowingA fixed fee is available instead of a percentage: as the payment grows, its share falls. Mass payouts to as many as 100 recipients for a single fee, POS as a separate product, and a sandbox on the Bitcoin testnet. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 8 | Details for PayPal Pay with CryptoPayPal Pay with Crypto US only | 6.1 | Large payment companies | Custodial Converts to fiat immediately | 1.5% | ~100 cryptocurrencies | Yes In the account currency | Required | N/A US merchants only | Regulated PSP (US) | Limited Gambling after a separate review | No data | No subscriptions and no multi-seller sales; not available to merchants in New York State. A refund debits the refund amount plus the network fee. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 9/10 Reliability 10/10 Cost 8/10 Features 4/10 Ease of onboarding 2/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 1.5% = 0.75 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 0.75 USDT of 50.00 USDT The flow has no merchant wallet at all: the buyer’s crypto is converted to PYUSD, the PYUSD to fiat, and the fiat lands on the PayPal balance. There is nothing to transfer, but the merchant has no invoice address of its own either. Worth knowingThe buyer pays from their own wallet, and the merchant gets fiat straight away. PYUSD is valued at $1.00 per token, on payment and on refund alike. RisksNo subscriptions and no multi-seller sales; not available to merchants in New York State. A refund debits the refund amount plus the network fee. Where we looked
Full data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 9 | Details for BTCPay ServerBTCPay Server Update needed | 6.0 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Self-hosted | 5.0% | BTC and Lightning; USDT on Tron, Ethereum, and Polygon via a plugin; altcoins optional | Partly Via third-party plugins, such as Bringin for euros | None | N/A It is software | Open-source software | Unrestricted No provider policy | Yes | A banner on the website calls on users to install a critical security update. Support comes from the community. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 5/10 Reliability 9/10 Cost 5/10 Features 10/10 Ease of onboarding 3/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 2.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT Nothing is paid to the service; the cost is your own server. But USDT on Tron runs through a separate Tether USDt plugin, and a TRC20 transfer from the invoice address to a pooled wallet costs about 65,000 energy. On your own server, no one but the merchant pays for it, so we use the market cost: 2.5 USDT. The zero is the service fee, not the all-in cost. Worth knowingAn open-source payment server for Bitcoin: invoices, POS, payment links, crowdfunding, and Lightning. RisksA banner on the website calls on users to install a critical security update. Support comes from the community. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 10 | Details for CoinremitterCoinremitter USDT by subscription, $99.99/mo | 5.9 | General-purpose gateways | Custodial Under its terms, Coinremitter holds funds as the merchant’s agent; auto-withdrawal to your address every 30 minutes | 4.2% | Free: BTC, LTC, BCH, DOGE, DASH, BNB, ZANO; Premium only: ETH, TRX, USDT TRC20 and ERC20, USDC ERC20 | No | Nominally none The FAQ asks for no documents; the terms require business and beneficial-owner details and reserve the right to verify them | Not found | Coinremitter Pte Ltd, Singapore; no licences stated | Limited The terms prohibit unlicensed gambling, and 18+ content where the law forbids it | No data | No licences are stated; the legal entity — Coinremitter Pte Ltd in Singapore — is named only in the terms, not on their “About us” page. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 5/10 Cost 5/10 Features 6/10 Ease of onboarding 8/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.00 USDT (their figure) Withdrawal fee 0.12 USDT Total per payment 2.12 USDT of 50.00 USDT The merchant pays gas on every payment, not once per withdrawal: with Gas Station, it is deducted on each incoming payment. A USDT TRC20 transfer costs 5 USDT without Gas Station and 2 USDT with it — we use their best figure, 2. On top comes 0.23% on withdrawal. Without Gas Station, the same payment comes to 10.2%. The percentage is not the main thing: USDT on Tron is available only on the $99.99-a-month plan, and on a single 50 USDT invoice that subscription costs more than any fee in the table. Worth knowingA wallet with invoice payments, CMS plugins, and coin swaps in the dashboard. Their Gas Station feature, they say, lowers the network fee on withdrawal. RisksNo licences are stated; the legal entity — Coinremitter Pte Ltd in Singapore — is named only in the terms, not on their “About us” page. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 11 | Details for OxaPayOxaPay Active | 5.8 | CIS, minimal KYC | Custodial | 7.0% | 18 coins; USDT on six networks | No | None No KYC and no KYB for merchants — per their help centre | Not found | No data | Yes Casinos, iGaming, and trading — named outright in their help centre | Yes | A short public track record: the site footer reads © 2022–2026. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 2/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 3/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 10/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 3.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT 2% plus a transfer fee. Their pricing page lists several products with different rates; we use the one the service applies in practice. Worth knowingSign-up by email, Google, or Telegram; an API and 13 plugins, WooCommerce, WHMCS, and Magento 2 among them. A buyer can pay an invoice from OxaPay’s Telegram wallet. RisksA short public track record: the site footer reads © 2022–2026. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 12 | Details for HeleketHeleket TRM Labs report | 5.7 | CIS, minimal KYC | Custodial | 2.0% | 17 coins, 8 networks | No Crypto only | Light Project moderation; no legal entity needed | Not found | No data | No data | Yes | According to a TRM Labs report (April 2026), the service is operationally linked to Cryptomus; the analysts classed 0.6% of its 2025 inbound volume as illicit funds — almost five times the average among payment providers. On 21 May 2026 the Bithumb exchange blocked all deposits and withdrawals linked to Heleket. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 1/10 Reliability 2/10 Cost 7/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 8/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 1.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT The “from 0.4%” on the site is a floor with no ceiling, not a price. The rate is published in their own API reference: percent 2.00 for USDT TRON. Their table of services is byte-for-byte identical to Cryptomus’s — the same engine, and both rows are calculated the same way. Worth knowingAuto-conversion to USDT, mass payouts, AML checks, and plugins for WooCommerce and WHMCS. RisksAccording to a TRM Labs report (April 2026), the service is operationally linked to Cryptomus; the analysts classed 0.6% of its 2025 inbound volume as illicit funds — almost five times the average among payment providers. On 21 May 2026 the Bithumb exchange blocked all deposits and withdrawals linked to Heleket. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 13 | Details for ConfirmoConfirmo MiCA and a payment licence | 5.7 | MiCA-licensed | Custodial | 9.0%≈ | USDC, USDT, USDG, BTC, and more | Yes | Required KYC and KYB | Yes Central Bank of Ireland | MiCA CASP and payment institution (Ireland) | Yes A dedicated landing page for online gambling | No data | On payouts to third parties, the merchant pays the network and processing fees by default; a payout parameter can shift them to the recipient. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 10/10 Reliability 8/10 Cost 2/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 5/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance — paid by the buyer 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT The pricing page returns a 404, and there is no price list anywhere. Worth knowingIn business since 2014: stablecoin acceptance and payouts, and conversion to fiat. The Irish entity is a MiCA CASP and a payment institution; with an EU passport, its services are available in all 27 member states. RisksOn payouts to third parties, the merchant pays the network and processing fees by default; a payout parameter can shift them to the recipient. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 14 | Details for PlisioPlisio Active | 5.7 | General-purpose gateways | Custodial The provider’s wallets; 90% of funds in cold storage | 8.5% | 28 coins and tokens on 14 networks | No The provider does not exchange crypto for fiat | None Per the FAQ, no identification required | Not found | No legal entity named: only “© Plisio, Inc.”, with no jurisdiction, address, or number | No data | Yes | No legal entity and no licences. The minimum USDT TRC20 invoice is $5. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 2/10 Reliability 6/10 Cost 2/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upMinimum fee instead of the rate 1.50 USDT Transfer to balance — paid by the buyer 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 0.25 USDT Total per payment 4.25 USDT of 50.00 USDT For USDT TRC20 their table says “minimum $1.5 up to 0.5%” — on a 50 USDT invoice the minimum is larger than the percentage, so the minimum applies. By default the buyer pays the network fee, “Clients cover the transaction fees”; we count it at the market figure, 2.5 USDT. API withdrawal is another 0.5%. Worth knowing19 plugins and 7 server libraries. API payouts and withdrawals cost 0.5% each. RisksNo legal entity and no licences. The minimum USDT TRC20 invoice is $5. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 15 | Details for B2BINPAYB2BINPAY Active | 5.6 | iGaming and high-risk | Custodial A separate DeFi product: non-custodial multisig accounts | 6.0% | 350+ cryptocurrencies; USDT on 10 networks, including Tron | Yes Auto-conversion to USD and EUR, bank withdrawal via SEPA and SWIFT in T+1 | Required KYB via Sumsub; sandbox only until you pass it | No | Mauritius, El Salvador | Yes | No data | It does not serve the US — its FAQ for casinos puts this down to regulatory requirements. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 5/10 Reliability 6/10 Cost 4/10 Features 9/10 Ease of onboarding 5/10 How the cost adds upMinimum fee instead of the rate 3.00 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 3.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT Stablecoins cost 0.50% at volumes up to $1 million, but the minimum on Tron is $3, which is more than the percentage. There is no percentage on outgoing transfers. Worth knowingAccording to the company, by 2025 it had 983 business clients and had processed $5.1 billion in incoming payments. It also has a gateway under the client’s own brand (white label) for e-commerce, fintechs and brokers, high-risk niches, and crypto exchanges. RisksIt does not serve the US — its FAQ for casinos puts this down to regulatory requirements. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 16 | Details for XAIGATEXAIGATE Three different rates on the site | 5.5 | CIS, minimal KYC | Custodial By their own terms, XAIGATE controls the receiving addresses | 5.5% | 17 coins in the fee table; API: Ethereum, BSC, and Tron | No Auto-conversion to USDT | None But their terms let them demand KYC and KYB at any time | Not found | HOANG QUAN INTERNATIONAL LLC, Garland, Texas; no licences stated | Yes “Built specifically for gambling and high-risk platforms” — their wording | No data | They call themselves a no-KYC service, but clause 4.2 of their own terms permits verification at any time. The model is custodial, yet they hold no licence at all. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 2/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 4/10 Features 5/10incomplete Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.5% = 0.25 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 2.75 USDT of 50.00 USDT The figures on the site disagree: 0.2% in the fee table, 0% on the free plan up to 500 transactions a month, 0.15% on premium, and “around 0.2–0.5% per transaction” on the low-fee page. We use the top of that range, 0.5%. Under their terms, network costs are deducted from the merchant’s balance; they give the USDT TRC20 charge as a 1–3 USDT range, so we use the market figure, 2.5 USDT. Worth knowingPlugins for WooCommerce, Magento 2, OpenCart, and PrestaShop; AML monitoring of payments with no check of the merchant’s identity. RisksThey call themselves a no-KYC service, but clause 4.2 of their own terms permits verification at any time. The model is custodial, yet they hold no licence at all. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 17 | Details for xRocket PayxRocket Pay Active | 5.4 | Telegram | Custodial | 15.0%≈ | BTC, ETH, TRX, TON jettons, BNB, USDT, SOL | No | Light Checks for P2P and for transactions of $10,000 or more; otherwise on suspicion | Not found | XROCKET CORP., Panama; no licences stated | No data | Yes | None noted | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 5/10 Cost 2/10 Features 6/10incomplete Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 4.00 USDT Total per payment 7.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT The processing fee is visible only to a signed-in merchant, so we use 2% and the market 2.5 USDT for the transfer to balance. Their API shows the withdrawal fee openly: USDT on Tron costs exactly 4 USDT — 8% in a single withdrawal on a 50 USDT invoice. Worth knowingInvoices, multi-use cheques, and paid subscriptions to private channels and groups. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 18 | Details for Crypto PayCrypto Pay @CryptoBot Payment only from the bot’s wallet | 5.3 | Telegram | Custodial A wallet inside the bot | 9.0%≈ | BTC, ETH, USDT, TON, and more | No | Nominally none No KYC for basic features; the Crypto Pay policy reserves the right to request KYC from a partner | Not found | No data | No data | Yes | None noted | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 6/10 Cost 2/10 Features 4/10 Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT They do not publish a processing rate: their own FAQ sets out fees for P2P, exchange, and subscriptions, while the Crypto Pay section has no pricing block at all. The earlier 3% came from an unrelated website. The money lands on the bot’s internal balance and has to be withdrawn from there. Worth knowingAn API for invoices, statuses, and webhooks; the buyer pays from their wallet balance without leaving Telegram. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 19 | Details for WestWalletWestWallet All fees on sending | 5.3 | CIS, minimal KYC | Custodial WestWallet holds the funds, 90% in offline storage | 5.0% | 28 assets; USDT on five networks | No data | No data | Not found | No legal entity named: the footer carries only a copyright sign | No data | Yes | No legal entity or jurisdiction named: for requests from authorities there is only the address [email protected]. Nowhere does it say who bears the network fee. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 5/10 Cost 4/10 Features 6/10incomplete Ease of onboarding 7/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee 2.53 USDT Total per payment 2.53 USDT of 50.00 USDT This is a wallet with an API, not a percentage gateway: receiving USDT TRC20 costs nothing, and the whole price sits on sending — 2.5 USDT plus 0.05%. That 2.5 USDT is their price, not a network fee passed through: for partners with 50+ outgoing transfers a day, the same outgoing transfer costs 2 USDT. Worth knowingFixed fees instead of a percentage of turnover. The 0.15% fee applies only to sending via the API and requires at least 50 transactions a day. RisksNo legal entity or jurisdiction named: for requests from authorities there is only the address [email protected]. Nowhere does it say who bears the network fee. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 20 | Details for BVNKBVNK now part of Mastercard Acquired by Mastercard | 5.3 | Large payment companies | Custodial | 9.0%≈ | USDC, USDT (outside the EEA, including on Tron), EURC, PYUSD, USDG; BTC, ETH, SOL, TRX, and more | Yes Settlement in USD, EUR, or GBP | Required KYB; clients with $500k+ in monthly volume and at least 6 months of history | Yes CASP and EMI, MFSA (Malta) | EMI in the UK (FCA) and Malta, MiCA CASP (MFSA), US state money transmitter licences; part of Mastercard since 3 August 2026 | Limited Gambling and FX/CFD: licensed only | No data | BVNK has belonged to Mastercard since 3 August 2026, and client terms may change. The set of assets depends on jurisdiction: USDT and PYUSD are switched off for clients in the EEA, and since 1 April 2026 incoming USDT and PYUSD transfers to them are automatically returned to the sender. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 10/10 Reliability 9/10 Cost 2/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 3/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT Worth knowingStablecoin acceptance and payouts, with conversion to fiat and back, in 130+ countries. Mastercard bought BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, of which $300 million is paid on reaching performance targets. RisksBVNK has belonged to Mastercard since 3 August 2026, and client terms may change. The set of assets depends on jurisdiction: USDT and PYUSD are switched off for clients in the EEA, and since 1 April 2026 incoming USDT and PYUSD transfers to them are automatically returned to the sender. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 21 | Details for CryptomusCryptomus FINTRAC fine | 5.3 | General-purpose gateways | Custodial | 2.0% | 100+ cryptocurrencies | Yes SEPA/SWIFT to a bank account | Required For all users | Not found | FINTRAC MSB (Xeltox Enterprises) | No The terms prohibit gambling and adult content | Yes | FINTRAC fined the operator, Xeltox Enterprises Ltd., 176.96 million Canadian dollars for breaching AML requirements — a record for the agency; an appeal has been filed. In TRM Labs’ assessment, the service is linked to Heleket. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 1/10 Reliability 2/10 Cost 7/10 Features 8/10 Ease of onboarding 6/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance not charged Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 1.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT The “from 0.4%” on the site is the floor, while new merchants get 2% — the same figure as in the sample response from their API. On withdrawal they deduct only the network fee, and that stays out of the calculation. Worth knowingA gateway, a wallet, crypto cards, and an exchange in one service; merchants go through moderation and KYC. RisksFINTRAC fined the operator, Xeltox Enterprises Ltd., 176.96 million Canadian dollars for breaching AML requirements — a record for the agency; an appeal has been filed. In TRM Labs’ assessment, the service is linked to Heleket. Where we looked
Full data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 22 | Details for PayGate.toPayGate.to Three different fees on the site | 5.1 | CIS, minimal KYC | Non-custodial Forwarding to your wallet | 6.5% | USDT on 9 networks, Tron included; USDC on 10; 47 tickers on 18 networks in total | No Crypto only | None No sign-up, no KYB, no API keys | Not found | No legal entity named; they describe themselves as selling software, not payment services | Yes “Complete high-risk payment infrastructure” — their wording | No data | No legal entity named: the terms refer to an “about us” page, “if such exists”. They describe themselves as a software provider and cannot cancel or refund a transfer. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 3/10 Cost 3/10 Features 5/10 Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 1.5% = 0.75 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 3.25 USDT of 50.00 USDT Their pages give three different figures: “less than 1%” in the FAQ, “1% + Provider fees” for the card gateway, and “1.5% flat rate fee + blockchain fees” on the crypto gateway page and in their plugin. We use the last one, 1.5%. There is no intermediate balance: a temporary address for each payment forwards the money to your wallet, and the network charges for that forwarding on top of the percentage — we use the market figure, 2.5 USDT. There is no withdrawal step. Worth knowingPayment right on the merchant’s site: an address with a QR code for each order, and every payment goes straight to the merchant’s wallet. No sign-up and no KYC. RisksNo legal entity named: the terms refer to an “about us” page, “if such exists”. They describe themselves as a software provider and cannot cancel or refund a transfer. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 23 | Details for CoinPaymentsCoinPayments Active | 5.1 | General-purpose gateways | Custodial Hosted wallet | 8.0% | 40+ cryptocurrencies | Partly Bank withdrawal through partners, where available | Required KYB | No | PaidInSatoshi Inc. (Panama) and Centauri Pay LLC (US) provide the services; no licences listed on the site | Yes iGaming is among their target markets; the fee may be higher for high-risk industries | Yes | None noted | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 2/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 6/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 3.0% = 1.50 USDT Transfer to balance — paid by the buyer 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 4.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT 3% on both coins and tokens — per their pricing page, checked on 21 September 2026. On top of the percentage they charge the network fee: in ASAP mode, one per payment; in Nightly, one for the whole batch. We use ASAP — it is their default mode. Worth knowingOn the market since 2013, with more than 250,000 merchants by their own count. By default, payments accumulate on a pooled balance; forwarding to your own address can be switched on right after crediting (ASAP) or in a daily batch (Nightly). The buyer pays the network fee on an incoming payment; on withdrawal, the merchant pays only the network fee. Where we looked
Full data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 24 | Details for PassimPayPassimPay Four different rates on the site | 5.1 | General-purpose gateways | Custodial | 8.5% | 74+ cryptocurrencies, 18+ networks | Yes EUR via SEPA, INR via API | Required KYC and KYB | Not found | NILESPAY FINANCE INC., Vancouver, no. BC1516629, FINTRAC MSB C100000852 | Yes iGaming is on their list of industries | No data | The processing price differs from page to page on the site — from zero to 3.5%. The terms are with Poland’s PASSIMPAY GLOBAL SP Z O O, while the MSB licence is held by Canada’s NILESPAY FINANCE INC. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 5/10 Reliability 6/10 Cost 2/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 6/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 3.5% = 1.75 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 4.25 USDT of 50.00 USDT Four fees on one site: 1.2% “by default”, 0.1–1% on a personal account, “starting from 0.5% (3.5% by default)” on a business account, and “Top-up fee is 0%”. We use their own business default, 3.5%. On top comes the network fee for moving the payment from the invoice address to the main address: they have no figure of their own, so we use the market one, 2.5 USDT. Withdrawal is free. Worth knowingAuto-conversion to USDT and USDC. By the company’s own figures, 530+ merchants and more than $4 billion in turnover. RisksThe processing price differs from page to page on the site — from zero to 3.5%. The terms are with Poland’s PASSIMPAY GLOBAL SP Z O O, while the MSB licence is held by Canada’s NILESPAY FINANCE INC. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 25 | Details for 0xProcessing0xProcessing Active | 5.0 | iGaming and high-risk | Custodial | 9.0%≈ | 100+ cryptocurrencies on 20+ networks | Yes Withdrawal to a company bank account | Light Application and KYB through a manager; the home page promises no documents are needed | Not found | 14partners Limited, Seychelles, no. 243468; no licences stated | Yes iGaming has its own page on their site | No data | By default, a floating network fee is added to the buyer’s payment: in their example, a 1,000 USDT payment on Tron costs the buyer 1,000.81 USDT — about 10 TRX on top. The merchant can absorb the fee instead, in the settings. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 6/10 Cost 2/10 Features 8/10 Ease of onboarding 6/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance — paid by the buyer 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT The fees page gives no percentage — “can be discussed with a manager”. There is a transfer to balance, and by default the buyer pays for it, but they publish no TRC20 figure of their own on the deposit side, so we use the market figure. The 2.6 USDT previously shown here was a mistake: that is their network fee for WITHDRAWAL, and the scenario does not count it. Worth knowingA processor for iGaming, forex, and other high-risk niches. Conversion to stablecoins (VRCS) carries no fee, but the exchange rate and spread are not disclosed. Subscriptions and mass payouts are available. RisksBy default, a floating network fee is added to the buyer’s payment: in their example, a 1,000 USDT payment on Tron costs the buyer 1,000.81 USDT — about 10 TRX on top. The merchant can absorb the fee instead, in the settings. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 26 | Details for Triple-ATriple-A Treasury hack, July 2026 | 5.0 | MiCA-licensed | Custodial | 9.0%≈ | Stablecoins and major coins | Yes Operations in local currencies | Required KYC and KYB | Yes AMF, France | MAS Major Payment Institution PS20200525 (Singapore), AMF CASP A2026-015 and ACPR PI (France), FinCEN and FINTRAC MSB | Limited Gambling and off-site 18+ content for direct merchants: on the restricted list, not the prohibited one, with enhanced checks | No data | On 25 July 2026, wallets of the Singapore entity holding the company’s own assets were hacked. Triple-A does not name the amount; press estimates range from $9.7 million to $11.8 million. MAS and the Singapore police are investigating. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 10/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 2/10 Features 8/10 Ease of onboarding 3/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT The pricing page has been removed from their knowledge base: it is absent from the 97-URL sitemap, the live URL is stuck in a 301 redirect loop, and a search for “fee” finds nothing. A 2023 archived copy on their domain read “a flat 1% transaction fee on all payments and payouts” — their figure, but three years old and taken down, so we do not count it. In its place goes the standard stand-in: 2% for processing, the same for withdrawal, and 2.5 USDT for the transfer to balance. Their withdrawals to a bank account start at $3,000. Worth knowingWorks with large clients: stablecoin acceptance and payouts, settlement in local currencies. KYC and KYB, sanctions screening, and the Travel Rule sit on the provider’s side. RisksOn 25 July 2026, wallets of the Singapore entity holding the company’s own assets were hacked. Triple-A does not name the amount; press estimates range from $9.7 million to $11.8 million. MAS and the Singapore police are investigating. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 27 | Details for BitHideBitHide Licence price not published | 4.8 | CIS, minimal KYC | Self-hosted Only you hold the keys | 5.0% | BTC, LTC, ETH, TRX, BNB, and USDT and USDC on ERC20, TRC20, and BEP20 | No Crypto only | No data | Not found | BITHIDE SOLUTION LLC, Tbilisi (Georgia); public offer agreement under the law of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It provides no financial services: it is a software vendor | Yes Licensed iGaming is on their list of industries | No data | The software is not available to companies from the US, the EU, or sanctioned jurisdictions — their own condition. Compliance is entirely on you. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 5/10 Features 4/10incomplete Ease of onboarding 6/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 2.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT They take no percentage per payment at all: this is a licence for software you install on your own server. But the licence price is not published either — the agreement sends you to the website for it, where it is not listed, and promises to name it at purchase. An address is issued for each invoice, and the merchant pays for the transfer from it to the main wallet: we use the market cost, 2.5 USDT. Worth knowingInstalled on your own server; the keys never leave the merchant. Gas for transfers is held on separate gas-station addresses for ETH, TRX, and BNB. RisksThe software is not available to companies from the US, the EU, or sanctioned jurisdictions — their own condition. Compliance is entirely on you. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 28 | Details for Payid19Payid19 Active | 4.8 | CIS, minimal KYC | Custodial Funds sit in a shared Payid19 wallet | 8.0% | USDT on Tron, BSC, and Ethereum; USDC, BTC, ETH, LTC, BNB, and TRX | No Crypto only: balance in USDT, withdrawal to a wallet | None Verification only before withdrawal; no documents asked for to accept payments | Not found | Payid19 Inc; the terms say “licensed” with no regulator or licence number; address in the Seychelles | Limited “Higher fees in our sole discretion”; porn prohibited, gambling only if legal | No data | In its terms, Payid19 Inc calls itself “licensed” but gives neither a regulator nor a licence number. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 2/10 Features 5/10 Ease of onboarding 8/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 1.0% = 0.50 USDT Transfer to balance — paid by the buyer 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT 1% with a 0.2 USDT minimum — on a 50 USDT invoice that comes to 0.5 USDT. The payment page adds the network fee to what the buyer pays, on top of the invoice; we count it at the market figure, 2.5 USDT. Withdrawal is a flat 1 USDT. Worth knowingIn operation since 2020. RisksIn its terms, Payid19 Inc calls itself “licensed” but gives neither a regulator nor a licence number. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 29 | Details for BitcartBitcart Active | 4.7 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Self-hosted | 5.0% | 10 networks and 248 tokens, including USDT on Tron | No | None | N/A It is software | Open-source software | Unrestricted | No data | Support is do-it-yourself, or paid from the project’s author: there is no legal entity behind Bitcart. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 5/10 Reliability 5/10 Cost 5/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 3/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 2.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT Nothing is paid to the service: the cost is your own server. USDT on Tron is supported natively, but a TRC20 transfer from the invoice address to a pooled wallet costs about 65,000 energy — around 2.5 USDT at the current TRX price, and in a self-hosted setup that is the merchant’s expense. The zero is the service fee, not the all-in cost. Worth knowingOpen-source payment processing on your own server. In the basic mode, neither Bitcart nor the owner of a third-party server takes a percentage: payments go straight to the merchant’s wallet. The NVD vulnerability database has no entries for Bitcart. RisksSupport is do-it-yourself, or paid from the project’s author: there is no legal entity behind Bitcart. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 30 | Details for SharkCryptoSharkCrypto Fee not published | 4.6 | CIS, minimal KYC | Custodial | 9.0%≈ | USDT on Tron, Ethereum, BSC, TON, and Polygon | No Crypto only | Not stated | Not found | No legal entity, terms, or AML policy: these pages do not exist on the site | No data | Yes | The publicly served code of their own admin panel contains an exchange-rate markup — up to 10% per merchant, on top of a hidden global spread. No terms, no legal entity, and not one published price. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 2/10 Reliability 3/10 Cost 2/10 Features 4/10incomplete Ease of onboarding 9/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT They do not publish the fee: “set by the administrator”, “depends on your monthly volume”. With no price list, we count 2% for processing, the same for withdrawal, and the transfer to balance at the market figure. Worth knowingTheir Official SDKs and Plugins section shows four SDKs and four plugins with ready-made install commands, but every one is marked Coming Soon, with a note underneath that all of it is in development. So the feature checklist credits them with zero integrations, although the site displays eight. RisksThe publicly served code of their own admin panel contains an exchange-rate markup — up to 10% per merchant, on top of a hidden global spread. No terms, no legal entity, and not one published price. Where we lookedPartial data | ||||||||||||||
| 31 | Details for DV.netDV.net Active | 4.6 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Non-custodial | 5.0% | USDT, USDD, USD1, and TRX on Tron, plus other networks | No | Nominally none README: no mandatory KYC/KYB; the terms collect beneficiary data and reserve the right to verify identity | Not found | DV Technologies Ltd., Seychelles; no licences stated | No data | No data | No licences stated. There is no mandatory KYC, but the terms collect beneficiary data and reserve the provider’s right to verify identity and to introduce fees at any time. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 3/10 Cost 5/10 Features 6/10 Ease of onboarding 5/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee not charged Total per payment 2.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT “We do not charge fees for accepting and withdrawing cryptocurrencies” — their wording. Only the network gets paid: they themselves estimate a USDT transfer from the deposit address to the main wallet at $2–5 when TRX is burned, and at roughly zero if you delegate your own energy. We use the market figure, 2.5 USDT. Worth knowingOpen source: install it on your own server or run it in their cloud — either way, with no fee to the provider. A payment arrives at a deposit address and is forwarded from there to the merchant’s wallet. RisksNo licences stated. There is no mandatory KYC, but the terms collect beneficiary data and reserve the provider’s right to verify identity and to introduce fees at any time. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 32 | Details for BitpaceBitpace Prices not published | 4.3 | iGaming and high-risk | Both models Q500 MEA holds the funds (Fireblocks and BitGo); Q500 Canada: no custody, delivery straight to the merchant’s wallet | 9.0%≈ | Catalogue: 16 assets, no USDT; the gateway pages say “70+” | Yes Settlement in EUR, USD, GBP, or USDC; fiat is withdrawn to a corporate bank account | Required KYB before the account opens; legal entities only | No Not in the MiCA CASP register | Q500 Canada Inc., Toronto, no. 1630813-9, MSB registered with FINTRAC; Q500 MEA Limited, Comoros, MISA licence | Yes | No data | Not a single published price: in their own FAQ, the question “What are the fees for using Bitpace’s Crypto Payment Gateway?” is answered with a line about encryption. USDT is missing from their asset catalogue, although the Tron network is listed. They work only with legal entities. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 4/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 2/10 Features 7/10incomplete Ease of onboarding 5/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee — not published, 2% used 2.0% = 1.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 4.50 USDT of 50.00 USDT The pricing page returns a 404, and the terms refer to a separate agreement. With no price available, we count 2% for processing, 2.5 USDT for the transfer to balance, and 2% for withdrawal. Worth knowingTwo legal entities with different models: the Canadian Q500 Canada holds no funds and sends them straight to the merchant, while the international Q500 MEA holds them in Fireblocks and BitGo wallets. RisksNot a single published price: in their own FAQ, the question “What are the fees for using Bitpace’s Crypto Payment Gateway?” is answered with a line about encryption. USDT is missing from their asset catalogue, although the Tron network is listed. They work only with legal entities. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 33 | Details for AlphaPoAlphaPo Offshore | 4.0 | iGaming and high-risk | Custodial | 10.2%≈ | 42 assets on 17 networks, including USDT on TRC20 | Partly Invoices and balances in 49 fiat currencies, but the balance is virtual: fiat cannot be withdrawn | Required Documents and verification before access to the service | Not found | AlphaPo Solution Inc., Panama, no. 155748730; no licences stated | Yes | No data | The FBI attributes the 2023 theft of $60 million from AlphaPo to North Korean hackers of the Lazarus Group. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 3/10 Cost 2/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 5/10 How the cost adds upMinimum fee instead of the rate 1.60 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 1.00 USDT Total per payment 5.10 USDT of 50.00 USDT The percentage is in the dashboard and is not public. But a minimum fee per deposit is published: €1.50 for USDT TRC-20, and on a 50 USDT invoice the minimum wins out over the percentage. The coin page on the site has gone stale (© 2024) and does not list Tron; the docs do — the rail is there. Worth knowingTwo ways to accept payments: deposit channels with no fixed amount for iGaming, and invoices for an exact fiat amount for online shops. RisksThe FBI attributes the 2023 theft of $60 million from AlphaPo to North Korean hackers of the Lazarus Group. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 34 | Details for PayRamPayRam Active | 3.9 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Self-hosted | 10.0% | USDT, USDC, PYUSD; Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Tron, Bitcoin; Solana and BNB Chain via Smart Bridge | No | None There is no account | N/A It is software | No legal entity named: the agreement is with “PayRam App”, and the contacts list only Telegram, email, and Calendly | Unrestricted iGaming, 18+, and gambling are on their list of industries | Yes | A young project: the first entry in their changelog dates from August 2025. The 1–5% range is published without a single criterion for what the fee depends on. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 5/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 2/10 Features 6/10 Ease of onboarding 4/10 How the cost adds upProcessing fee 0.0% = 0.00 USDT Transfer to balance 2.50 USDT Withdrawal fee 2.50 USDT Total per payment 5.00 USDT of 50.00 USDT Accepting costs nothing. They take 1–5% when funds are withdrawn to a cold wallet and publish no criteria, so we use the top of the range, 5%. The merchant pays the gas for transfers out of deposit addresses from their own Gas Station: we use the market figure, 2.5 USDT. Worth knowingRuns on your own server. Through Smart Bridge it accepts bitcoin and USDT on Tron, plus payments from BNB Chain and Solana, with no node of your own and settlement in USDC on Base. There is an MCP server, a REST API, a WooCommerce plugin, and a Shopify connector. RisksA young project: the first entry in their changelog dates from August 2025. The 1–5% range is published without a single criterion for what the fee depends on. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 35 | Details for CoinGateCoinGate No USDT since March 2025 | 6.0 | MiCA-licensed | Custodial | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | 11 assets: USDC, EURC, BTC, TRX, and more. No USDT | Yes EUR, USD, GBP | Required | Yes Bank of Lithuania | UAB “Decentralized”, Vilnius, company code 303423510; MiCA CASP LB002323 and payment institution LB002324 with the Bank of Lithuania | Limited The terms prohibit unlicensed gambling and 18+ content without age verification | No data | CoinGate cannot take a USDT invoice on any network: USDT support was wound down in Q1 2025, and on 24 March the remaining balances were converted to USDC one to one. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 10/10 Reliability 8/10 Cost 1/10 Features 9/10 Ease of onboarding 6/10 Worth knowingMore than ten years on the market: plugins for the main e-commerce platforms, operations in 180+ countries, settlement in EUR, USD, and GBP. On the Standard plan, the merchant is paid out once a week. RisksCoinGate cannot take a USDT invoice on any network: USDT support was wound down in Q1 2025, and on 24 March the remaining balances were converted to USDC one to one. Where we looked
Full data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 36 | Details for Stripe | 5.7 | Large payment companies | Custodial | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | USDC on Tempo, Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and Base; USDP and USDG in the US only; from a Crypto.com account, any token on that exchange. No on-chain USDT | Yes To the Stripe balance, in your currency | Required | Via group Bridge: CASP and EMI, Luxembourg | Regulated PSP; Bridge: MiCA CASP and EMI | Limited | No data | Access is limited for businesses outside the US; these payments have no dispute mechanism. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 9/10 Reliability 10/10 Cost 1/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 5/10 Worth knowingBuilt into Stripe Checkout. USDC acceptance is open to Shopify merchants in 34 countries; in the EU, Hong Kong, Mexico, and Switzerland, it is in private preview. A $10,000 limit per transaction; refunds go back in stablecoins to the buyer’s original wallet. RisksAccess is limited for businesses outside the US; these payments have no dispute mechanism. Where we looked
Full data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 37 | Details for BitPayBitPay MiCA since July 2026 | 5.6 | MiCA-licensed | Custodial | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | BTC and Lightning, BCH, LTC, DOGE, XRP, Polygon, Ethereum, L2s, and Solana; no Tron network | Yes 9 currencies, banks in 37 countries | Required Four tiers by volume, requiring documents and beneficial-owner details | Yes AFM, Netherlands | MiCA (AFM), US state money transmitter licences | Limited Their footnote: “Higher fees applicable for high-risk industries” | No data | BitPay cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron: Tron is not on its list of networks. The fixed $0.25 on a 50 USDT invoice adds another half a percent. In 2021, BitPay paid OFAC $507,375 over 2,102 apparent sanctions violations, and in 2023 NYDFS fined it $1 million. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 10/10 Reliability 9/10 Cost 1/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 5/10 Worth knowingOperating since 2011: fiat settlement every business day, with a $20 minimum. The rate falls with volume: 2% up to $500,000 a month, 1.5% up to $1 million, then 1%. RisksBitPay cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron: Tron is not on its list of networks. The fixed $0.25 on a 50 USDT invoice adds another half a percent. In 2021, BitPay paid OFAC $507,375 over 2,102 apparent sanctions violations, and in 2023 NYDFS fined it $1 million. Where we looked
Full data Full review of this provider | ||||||||||||||
| 38 | Details for BlockonomicsBlockonomics USDT on Ethereum only | 5.4 | Non-custodial and self-hosted | Non-custodial | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | BTC, BCH, and USDT; USDT on Ethereum only | No | None | Not found | OneByZero Tech Pte. Ltd., Singapore law; no licences stated | No data | Yes | None noted | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 1/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 8/10 Worth knowingBTC, BCH, and USDT payments go straight to the merchant’s wallet, and checkout happens on the merchant’s own site, with no redirect to a third-party page. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 39 | Details for Crypto.com PayCrypto.com Pay No Tron network | 4.9 | Large payment companies | Custodial Revenue accumulates on the merchant’s balance; withdrawal on request | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | USDT on Cronos, ERC20, and Polygon; USDC on six networks | Yes Payouts in USD, EUR (SEPA), and AUD to a bank account | Required | Via group Foris DAX MT, MiCA CASP, Malta | Class 2 MiCA CASP (Malta), MPI in Singapore, EMI in the UK | No data | No data | Crypto.com Pay cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron: Tron is not on its list of networks. The Dutch central bank fined Foris DAX MT €2.85 million for operating without registration. In January 2022, 483 accounts were hacked for $34 million; the affected customers were reimbursed. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 7/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 1/10 Features 5/10 Ease of onboarding 6/10 Worth knowingBuyers pay from the Crypto.com app or from an external wallet, using the address and QR code; on such a transfer, the buyer pays the network fee. RisksCrypto.com Pay cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron: Tron is not on its list of networks. The Dutch central bank fined Foris DAX MT €2.85 million for operating without registration. In January 2022, 483 accounts were hacked for $34 million; the affected customers were reimbursed. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 40 | Details for Binance PayBinance Pay Payment only within Binance | 4.7 | Large payment companies | Custodial Within Binance | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | 50+ cryptocurrencies | Partly Via the exchange | Required A corporate Binance account with entity verification is required | No Application in Greece withdrawn on 24 June 2026 | No data | Limited 18+, unlicensed gambling, and some high-risk industries are not accepted | No data | Only Binance users can pay. In 2023, Binance pleaded guilty in the US and agreed to pay $4.3 billion under its agreement with the Department of Justice; claims by FinCEN, OFAC, and the CFTC were settled in parallel. The company withdrew its MiCA licence application in Greece in June 2026. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 5/10 Reliability 7/10 Cost 1/10 Features 5/10 Ease of onboarding 6/10 Worth knowingAccording to Richard Teng, one of Binance’s two CEOs, more than 21 million merchants accept Binance Pay. In May 2026, QR payments worked in six countries in Asia and Latin America; by Q3, Binance aims to reach at least 10 countries, including some outside those regions. RisksOnly Binance users can pay. In 2023, Binance pleaded guilty in the US and agreed to pay $4.3 billion under its agreement with the Department of Justice; claims by FinCEN, OFAC, and the CFTC were settled in parallel. The company withdrew its MiCA licence application in Greece in June 2026. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
| 41 | Details for Coinbase BusinessCoinbase Business and Coinbase Payments US and Singapore | 4.4 | Large payment companies | Custodial | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | USDC on Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, and Arbitrum; USDT on Ethereum only, and not in every country. No Tron network | Yes Bank withdrawal | Required KYB plus KYC of every beneficial owner: EIN, W-9, documents | N/A Not available in the EU | Regulated Coinbase group | No Unlicensed gambling and higher-risk businesses are prohibited | No data | Coinbase Business cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron: they added USDT on 11 August 2026, but only on Ethereum, and Tron is not on the list of networks. Coinbase Commerce has been closed since 31 March 2026; its replacement is open to merchants in the US and Singapore. The Central Bank of Ireland fined Coinbase Europe €21.5 million in November 2025. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 9/10 Reliability 8/10 Cost 1/10 Features 7/10 Ease of onboarding 2/10 Worth knowingThe successor to Coinbase Commerce: custody with Coinbase, withdrawal to a bank account, integrations with QuickBooks and Xero, and every payment product on stablecoins only. Plugins exist for WooCommerce, Magento, and WHMCS. Coinbase Payments is a product for platforms such as Shopify, not for an individual merchant. Coinbase promises expansion to other countries during 2026. RisksCoinbase Business cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron: they added USDT on 11 August 2026, but only on Ethereum, and Tron is not on the list of networks. Coinbase Commerce has been closed since 31 March 2026; its replacement is open to merchants in the US and Singapore. The Central Bank of Ireland fined Coinbase Europe €21.5 million in November 2025. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 42 | Details for PYMSTRPYMSTR No Tron network | 4.2 | iGaming and high-risk | Non-custodial | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | USDC and USDT on Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, and BNB; no Tron | No | None No KYB | Not found | Promeet Technology Limited, DIFC, UAE; no licences stated | Yes | No data | They cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron — Tron is missing from their list of networks. The service is young: the first version of the merchant agreement is dated 25 February 2026. | Partial data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 3/10 Cost 1/10 Features 2/10 Ease of onboarding 9/10 Worth knowingThe buyer signs in with Google, email, SMS, or Apple and gets an embedded wallet. RisksThey cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron — Tron is missing from their list of networks. The service is young: the first version of the merchant agreement is dated 25 February 2026. Where we looked
Partial data | ||||||||||||||
| 43 | Details for CoinsPaidCoinsPaid No USDT on any network | 4.1 | iGaming and high-risk | Custodial | This provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron | USDC on six networks, EURC, USDG, and 11 coins; no USDT | Yes Bank withdrawal in EUR only | Required | Applied Estonia, pending | No authorisation in the ESMA register; an application by Dream Finance OÜ is pending in Estonia | Yes | No data | The Estonian entity is not taking new clients until the regulator rules on its MiCA application, and the Lithuanian one has suspended all crypto-asset services — as their notice states. USDT has been removed from the public list of currencies; only native TRX is left. Two incidents: on 22 July 2023, the company lost $37.3 million in a hack and linked the attack to Lazarus, and in January 2024, analysts at Cyvers flagged an outflow of about $7.5 million, which CoinsPaid did not comment on. | Full data |
Scores by criterionRegulation 3/10 Reliability 4/10 Cost 1/10 Features 8/10 Ease of onboarding 5/10 Worth knowingInvoices, deposit channels, payment links, a POS terminal, and plugins for seven platforms, from WooCommerce to Shopify; iGaming is a separate line of business. RisksThe Estonian entity is not taking new clients until the regulator rules on its MiCA application, and the Lithuanian one has suspended all crypto-asset services — as their notice states. USDT has been removed from the public list of currencies; only native TRX is left. Two incidents: on 22 July 2023, the company lost $37.3 million in a hack and linked the attack to Lazarus, and in January 2024, analysts at Cyvers flagged an outflow of about $7.5 million, which CoinsPaid did not comment on. Where we looked
Full data | ||||||||||||||
Each provider has five scores, one per criterion, from 1 to 10. The total is their weighted average, with the weights set above, on the same ten-point scale. The scores are editorial and rest on public data.
10 — MiCA CASP authorisation together with a payment licence, or a regulated PSP. 7–8 — a licence held by the provider’s group or by its owner. 4–5 — MSB registration or offshore licences. 5 — self-hosted software that needs no licence. 3 — no public licences found, or no MiCA authorisation while an application is pending. 2 — custodial holding with no licences and no KYC. 1 — a regulator’s fine or a blockchain-analytics flag.
9–10 — many years on the market, large volumes, no public incidents. 7–8 — several years of stable operation. 5–6 — a mid-length track record, or little data. 3–4 — a young provider, a past hack, or an opaque ownership structure. 1–2 — regulator sanctions or a blockchain-analytics flag.
Every provider gets the same payment: a 50 USDT invoice on Tron, followed to the end — until the money is in the merchant’s wallet. Four amounts add up: the processing fee, fixed fees, the transfer from the invoice address to the balance, and the withdrawal fee. We leave out the network fee on a withdrawal, but only when the provider passes it on at cost and makes its money elsewhere: that fee is paid once per withdrawal, not on every payment. If the provider’s whole price sits on the withdrawal, it counts — otherwise the provider would look free. The Tron transfer is taken at 2.5 USDT wherever the provider names no price of its own. Who pays, merchant or buyer, does not change the total: a fee passed on to the buyer is still part of the price of the sale, and the breakdown shows whose pocket it comes from. Where the money lands straight in the merchant’s wallet, there is no withdrawal at all. The arithmetic is in each provider’s expanded row.
The transfer fee is part of this number. Moving money from the invoice address to a pooled wallet costs something on every network. Providers that publish their own figure: Coinremitter (2 USDT) and Trybit (1.4 USDT). For everyone else we use the market cost of a USDT transfer on Tron — 2.5 USDT. Where a provider does not charge this fee, the breakdown says “not charged”.
The ≈ sign marks providers whose rate we could not find — “individual”, “by agreement”, “contact us”, or no figure at all. In its place we use 2% plus the transfer fee. That is not the provider’s price but the top of the usual market range. So everyone under ≈ carries the same rate, and it says nothing about how they compare. A published figure will replace it.
The score comes from the all-in cost, not from the rate in the price list: up to 0.5% — 10; up to 1% — 9; up to 1.5% — 8; up to 2% — 7; up to 3% — 6; up to 5% — 5; up to 6% — 4; up to 7.5% — 3; above that — 2. A price-list rate covers processing only and says nothing about the transfer, so it gets no scale of its own. Providers under ≈ are scored on the stand-in 2%, not on their real price: once they publish it, the score will change. Conversion spreads are left out for everyone — almost no one discloses them.
The score comes from a checklist in four groups: how the provider takes an invoice — an address and QR code for each invoice, underpayment, overpayment, paying in parts or late, a rate held for the life of the invoice; what it does with the money — mass payouts, subscriptions, auto-conversion, fiat withdrawal, refunds; how it connects — CMS plugins, server SDKs, a sandbox, payment links, an embedded checkout, POS, Telegram; how a team works with it — roles and fiat invoice currencies. The number of assets and networks does not affect the score. A feature the provider describes nowhere is not counted.
9–10 — sign-up in minutes, with no KYC or a minimal check. 7–8 — self-serve onboarding with a review. 5–6 — mandatory KYB. 3–4 — onboarding only through a manager, or you host it yourself. 1–2 — available only in certain countries.
A dash in the cost column means the provider cannot take a USDT invoice on Tron. Those rows sit below all the others, whatever their score: there is one scenario here, and a provider that cannot run it does not compete with those that can. Their score stays visible — it tells you the provider is serious, just not for this job. “No data” means nothing turned up in public sources. “Not found” in the MiCA column means we did not come across an authorisation in the material we reviewed; check the ESMA register. “N/A” means not applicable.
Decision snapshot
01
Measure the self-serve path through first broadcast or detection on supported mainnet, then assess blockchain confirmation and finality separately.
02
Separate upfront onboarding steps from verification that may be triggered later by risk, limits, or regulation.
03
Check whether the accepted asset reaches the merchant balance unchanged or passes through conversion.
04
Model processing, fixed charges, payer network cost, collection, conversion, withdrawal fee, and minimum.
05
Confirm the exact server language, CMS, webhook behavior, and test-to-live contract your team needs.
06
Review custody, signing, withdrawal controls, reconciliation, refunds, limits, and support ownership.
Paymos product proof
01
The normal self-serve benchmark takes about 10 minutes from sign-up: create a project, test in Sandbox, switch the dashboard to Production, create separate live credentials, create a live invoice, and reach the point where its payment is broadcast or first detected on supported mainnet. The benchmark stops there: blockchain confirmation and finality depend on the network, amount, and conditions. It is not an SLA.
02
You can begin without submitting business documents upfront and without manual Production activation. Verification can still be requested later under risk, limit, or regulatory policy.
03
Sandbox and Production use the same API contract with separate credentials. Sandbox simulates supported flows; it does not move real assets.
04
Paymos maintains eight official server SDKs and eight official CMS plugins, alongside direct API integration.
Paymos cost path
The payer's wallet pays the send-network fee (gas). Paymos covers acceptance and consolidation network costs and does not add a separate transfer or sweep commission. The accepted asset reaches the merchant balance unchanged. A withdrawal has no processing commission; its disclosed subsidized network fee and minimum depend on the selected asset-network route.
The payer sends the selected asset and pays the wallet network fee.
Paymos accepts and consolidates the payment without a separate transfer or sweep commission.
The same accepted asset is credited to the merchant balance after the 1.0% Standard processing fee.
The merchant sees the subsidized withdrawal network fee and route minimum before confirming withdrawal.
Fit boundary
Validate the fit
Open the dashboard for the primary path, or start in Sandbox with the same API contract and separate test credentials.
Paymos compiled this comparison and is one of its rows. The scores are editorial; the data comes from public sources, was rechecked against each provider’s own pages, and is current as of . This is not an audit, and it is not legal or investment advice. Fees and licences change — before you sign up, check the contract and the ESMA register.