Skip to content

Keep the margin your runners earn

Roll CI minutes, build credits, and seats into one USDC invoice — usage you can finally charge for without a per-charge floor — and a paid invoice can't be clawed back.

Keep the margin your runners earn

Where dev-tools revenue leaks before usage-based pricing pays off

Why does a build-acceleration product get taxed on the savings it sells?

Four ways card-rail billing leaks dev-tools revenue before the value lands.

Per-minute CI costs compound before processing fees even touch them

CI runners are billed per minute, and Windows matrices cost well more than Linux. A busy monorepo can burn hundreds of dollars a month on runner time alone. Card processing then takes its percentage plus a recurring-billing add-on on every metered invoice. Your build-acceleration product sells against runner cost, but the rail taxes the savings on the way out — the very margin your runners were supposed to win back.

Seat licensing forces procurement-mandated annual prepay

Per-seat and per-host dev tools handle seat math fine on cards, but enterprise procurement wants annual prepay with a PO number, a contract number, and net-30 terms. Card-billing's prepay flow is weak — you end up scripting one-off invoices, emailing PDFs, and chasing the AP team. The self-serve seat-upgrade path stops working the moment a 200-person org shows up.

Consolidated team billing fractures on multi-currency dev teams

A per-user plan looks clean until the team is a dozen devs in Argentina, a few in the EU, a few in the US. Local currency volatility, cross-border surcharges, and settlement-timing mismatches add exchange-rate loss and a high decline rate on Latin-American issuers. The admin's card pays the consolidated invoice, but the underlying seats live in countries where the card rail routes through expensive acquirers.

Prepaid build credits leave finance teams with phantom balances

Credit-burn models force customers to top up in large chunks and watch the balance trickle down. Finance teams hate it: there's no predictable monthly invoice, just a treasury reserve sitting on a vendor's balance sheet. Refunds for unused credits go back through the card dispute path, so vendors stall on returning them — which is exactly the abandonment pattern that triggers a procurement audit later.

How one rolled-up invoice fixes dev-tools billing

What changes when a month of usage settles as one stablecoin payment?

Four things that go right when dev-tools billing leaves the card rail.

Per-minute CI usage rolls into one payment at period close

Your usage meter closes the billing period and posts one number to Paymos. The customer pays a single stablecoin invoice for the month's minutes — no percentage taken per metered event, no recurring-billing surcharge, no per-invoice fixed fee. The payment credits your Paymos balance on confirmation, so your gross margin on build acceleration finally reflects what your runners actually cost.

Annual prepay is one Payment Link with PO and contract metadata

An enterprise buyer wants twelve months prepaid at a locked price with a PO and contract reference on the invoice. Generate a one-shot Payment Link, attach the procurement metadata fields, and the AP team pays from their treasury wallet. No card-billing workaround, no PDF-emailing dance — the invoice is the settlement plus your CRM record, and a paid contract stays paid.

Multi-country teams pay in one stablecoin — no rate cliff at consolidation

Devs in Buenos Aires, Berlin, and Boulder all hold the same dollar stablecoin. The team admin authorises one consolidated payment in the asset they all share — no local-currency conversion, no settlement-timing mismatch, no Latin-American decline rate eating retention. The seat math runs the same everywhere, and the payment credits your Paymos balance final.

Build credits are a balance counter in your DB, refundable cleanly

Finance stops carrying a phantom reserve. The prepaid balance is a line in your own ledger — you draw it down as builds run, and hand back any remainder as a single outbound transfer from your treasury. No connected account per credit pool, no round-trip dispute fee on returns, no chargeback risk on a month-old top-up. The refund is a transfer you sign and time yourself.

How dev-tools platforms wire Paymos in

Which integration fits how you bill usage and seats?

Three ways to settle metered dev-tool revenue in stablecoins.

Dev-tools billing flows on stablecoins today

Which dev-tools models run cleanly on a wallet rail?

Four flows from real dev-tools setups — CI/CD, code review, build acceleration, deployment platforms.

CI/CD self-hosted runners — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI alternatives

A self-hosted runner product lives or dies on processing cost. A month of runner minutes rolls into one stablecoin invoice at period close, the payment confirms in seconds, and the money credits your Paymos balance — reclaimed margin that funds more runner capacity instead of the rail. A paid month can't be reversed, so it stays reclaimed.

Code review and linting — per-org team and enterprise tiers

Per-org pricing for code-review platforms sits in exactly the band where a fixed per-charge fee and a recurring-billing surcharge hurt most. A single stablecoin invoice per period carries no fixed floor and no recurring add-on — the team plan and the annual enterprise tier both settle clean, and the payment credits your Paymos balance final on confirmation.

Monorepo build acceleration — remote cache and satellite minutes

Build-acceleration products combine seat pricing with metered compute. Both legs roll into a single monthly stablecoin invoice — seats decremented from the prepay balance, compute metered to period close. No prepaid-credit treasury problem, because the balance lives as a counter in your DB. Finance sees a real recurring invoice line, not a topped-up reserve.

Deployment platforms — bandwidth, compute, and build minutes

Deployment platforms bill bandwidth, compute, and build minutes — three meters into one invoice. The customer settles the combined total in one payment that credits your Paymos balance on confirmation, with no per-meter fixed fee stacking up. A deployment startup competing on price gets that margin back to invest in faster cold-starts or cheaper bandwidth.

Developer tools on stablecoins

Frequently asked questions

How do per-minute CI invoices settle without paying a fee per metered event?
Your meter aggregates minutes in your own store and closes the period with one number. You post that as a single invoice and the customer settles it once on-chain — not per metered event, and not per minute. A month of millions of build-minutes is one transfer. An HMAC-SHA256 webhook confirms settlement so your receivable closes, and on a fast network like Base the settlement leg is negligible regardless of how many minutes rolled up.
How does annual prepay with a PO and net-30 work?
Net-30 stays a term of your contract, and the invoice with the PO number keeps coming from your invoicing tool — the AP team reconciles it against their commitment ledger as they do today. When they release payment within their window, send a Payment Link carrying your PO or contract reference as its order reference. The moment funds settle, your webhook fires with that reference and the receivable closes, with no PDF-emailing or Slack chase in between.
How do multi-country teams pay without exchange-rate loss at consolidation?
Every dev on the team holds the same dollar-denominated stablecoin regardless of where they live. The admin authorises one consolidated payment in that shared asset, so there's no local-currency conversion and no settlement-timing mismatch between regions. USDT on Tron is common for the Latin-American segment; USDC is common in the EU and US. The seat math is identical everywhere, and the consolidated invoice settles as one transfer.
How do prepaid build credits and their refunds work?
The customer prepays in stablecoins, and the balance sits in your own ledger — you draw it down as builds run. There's no connected account per credit pool and no deferred-revenue treasury problem, because the credits are pure store credit. To refund an unused balance, you initiate an outbound transfer from your Paymos balance — no round-trip dispute fee, no chargeback risk on a month-old top-up. It's a single transfer you sign and time yourself.
Which networks make sense for small team plans versus large enterprise prepay?
For small team plans and credit top-ups, fast networks like Base and Polygon keep the settlement leg negligible. A large enterprise prepay usually settles on Ethereum, the chain a corporate treasury can audit on a block explorer. USDT on Tron is the default many international dev teams already hold — for liquidity, though Tron carries the highest sender gas of the networks we support. USDC is common because dev-tools treasuries prefer to hold it. Expose the choice at checkout and let each customer settle on the chain and stablecoin they already hold.
Can self-serve stay on cards while enterprise prepay moves to stablecoins?
Yes — that's the common rollout. Self-serve plans stay on cards; enterprise prepay, CI rollups, and international teams move to Paymos. The rail is chosen per customer when the invoice is generated, and both legs feed one reconciliation.

Honest disqualifier

When NOT to use Paymos for developer tools

Four cases where staying on your current billing is the right call.

You sell monthly seats that renew off a saved card

There is no card on file here: a wallet payment happens only when the customer sends it, so nothing renews by itself. A $12/seat monthly plan that survives on silent renewal will leak churn if every cycle demands a manual payment. Route annual prepays, CI rollups, and credit top-ups through Paymos — payments customers already make deliberately — and let monthly seats keep their saved card.

Your accountant needs dollars in the bank, not in a wallet

Paymos settles in stablecoins to a wallet you control; there is no built-in cash-out to a bank and no fiat payout. If your close process requires dollars on the operating account within days, you'll run an exchange step yourself every cycle. Crypto-comfortable teams treat that as routine — but if nobody on staff wants to own it, the card processor's bank deposit is the simpler machine.

Your meter, plans, and invoices live inside a processor's billing objects

Unwinding a metered-billing integration that grew for two years isn't a weekend task — events, plan versions, and invoice rendering all assume the processor's schema. The pragmatic path is additive: new enterprise prepays and international teams settle through Paymos, while the legacy meter keeps running until you replatform for product reasons, not fee reasons.

All your teams are domestic and their cards never fail

A dev-tools vendor whose entire revenue is US or EU teams with reliable corporate cards won't feel most of what this rail fixes. The wins come from Latin-American seats that decline, exchange-rate loss on consolidated invoices, and per-event fee stacking. If your dashboards show none of that, there's nothing here to fix yet — revisit when the international share grows.

Pricing

1.0% per settled invoice. No recurring-billing premium on CI rollups

Same rate for the small team plan and the large annual enterprise prepay, at any size. High-volume tier at 0.3% on request. Card billing runs about 3% all-in, and a recurring-billing add-on stacks its own percentage on top of every metered invoice.

See pricing

Keep the margin your runners earn, the moment the payment clears